R1:9384c9e36b3d
R1:9384c9e36b3d
Don't consider integer CustomFields as changed when the number doesn't change
Summary: Fixes T4466. We do an excessively strict effect check now, which means that these fields changing from (string) "16" to (int) 16 generates a transaction. Instead, compare integer values if the field has data in it.
Test Plan:
{F116261}
(Also made updates without changing the number, which did not appear in the transaction log anymore.)
Reviewers: btrahan, richardvanvelzen
Reviewed By: richardvanvelzen
CC: aran…
Summary: Fixes T4466. We do an excessively strict effect check now, which means that these fields changing from (string) "16" to (int) 16 generates a transaction. Instead, compare integer values if the field has data in it.
Test Plan:
{F116261}
(Also made updates without changing the number, which did not appear in the transaction log anymore.)
Reviewers: btrahan, richardvanvelzen
Reviewed By: richardvanvelzen
CC: aran…
Repository: R1 hydra
Commit Date: Feb 21 2014